Temptation

The curse that was applied to Melusina was much bigger than just punishment for her wrongdoing, it was a future test for trust and patience for her future husband. The husband had to be strong enough to not only verbally agree to not pursue the desire to see her on a Saturday but to also act upon it. His desire to respect her wishes and to trust her had to be much bigger than his desire to know what he didn’t know about her, in which he failed, resulting to the rupture of their relationship. Melusina’s story represents just how big temptation can be in a relationship and how naturally as a human (or non-human) we are curious creatures who can be easily guided into giving in. Although for Melusina it appears that she was cursed from the start considering the following quote,

“But destiny, that would have Melusina single, was incensed against her.” (P. 87)

This makes me think that no matter what she could have done, in any universe/ world/ time, the revelation of her secret would have always happened. The temptation in her story would have always won while her hope for trust would have always lost. Although her ending did not go as she wished, it did go as planned because at the end of the day our life will always end how it is meant to.

Scales

This weekend’s readings from “The Penguin Book of Mermaids”—“Legend of Melusina” (LoM)—and Andre Libey’s “Romance of the Faery Melusine” return us to the ideas of hybridity of form as well as sapient beings in the periphery/at the ends of the known world. 

In LoM, Melusina is the hybrid descendent of the widowed King Elinas of Albania and the Fay Pressina. Elinas was drawn to his Queen-to-be’s voice—likely a reference to siren songs—and became betrothed to her and assured her company so long as he honored a single condition: he cannot see her on Saturdays. The king of course breaks his agreement thoughtlessly, causing Pressina to retreat to the “Lost Island”—in the periphery/at the edge of the known—with their daughters: Palatina, Melusina, and Melior.

Punishment – Like Father, Like Mother, Like Daughter

Much in the same way that Elinas’s breach of contract is made known by his daughters—who seemed far more capable than any newborns should be—his daughters, as a result of Melusina’s plans, inflict unsanctioned vengeance on their father and are punished by Pressina. For her part, Melusina is punished the most heavily and bears a curse: wielding a half serpent body, and needing to marry a man who can/will respect her Saturday away from him. Like her mother before her, she marries, bears children, and her secret is soon discovered. The “deformity” of her children earns them scorn from their father, which in turns bestows Melusina with grief and her own journey of separation and pain.  

Lines of Succession Know No Boundaries

The only thing that wives and mothers in the story of Melusina ask for is a respect of boundaries. Pressina, Melusina’s mother asked for Saturdays to herself from her husband and when she curses her daughter she sets for her the same boundary. This story embodies the themes in mermaid stories of demonizing the “other” and the female threat to a patriarchal system. Both of those themes play into the subtle political line of succession message in the legend.

The Fay Women found by human men when they were in need of saving are magical creatures. They provide love and success to these mortals in exchange for devotion and promises of letting them keep some part of their power. This power is not over others like it is expected in the patriarchal system of mortals, but in their autonomy to limit the access to their bodies by others. I found it interesting in both of the marriages of mother and daughter, it was a relative that encouraged the husbands of these Fay Women to violate this boundary set forth in the marriage.

In Pressina’s story, it is her male stepchild Nathas and likely heir to the throne of Albania that excited his father to violating the martial pact. It is not explained if Nathas knows of this agreement. Though if he knew about his stepmother giving birth before his father, it is fair to assume Nathas had his finger on the pulse of the activities in the castle. While the birth of three daughters might have not pushed Nathas out of the line of succession, his father’s current wife providing so many additional heirs might have challenged his position. Creating a wedge or a reason to dissolve the marriage might have been in the prince’s best interests.

Later in Melusina’s story it is the cousin of Raymond who had “excited him (Raymond) to jealousy…by malicious suggestions of the purport of the Saturday retirement of the countess” (88). Nathas used joy to break the martial bond, while this cousin used distrust of a wife who would not provide full access of herself to her husband at all times. As a wife Melusina had given Raymond riches and castles he wouldn’t have had otherwise, but she was still an outsider to the world of mortals. Stories and myths often depict how outsiders are always a threat to the accepted system.

The gender and position of the cousin is not depicted in the story, but the relationship of this family member to Raymond reminded me of the only other mention of his family. When we are first introduced to Raymond he has just “accidentally killed” (87) his uncle who is a count. Melusina uses her power (possibly influence) to protect Raymond from the fallout of this killing.

Could this cousin be a child of that uncle?

Could this be a cold dish of revenge by someone whose position was lost from this coupling?

Or was it just Melusina’s ability to maintain some form of power over the societal powerful position of Raymond?

Raymond’s strength is made secure not only through what Melusina built for him but in the children she bore, his heirs. It is only when the sons of Raymond and Melusina are taken out (or at least compromised) of the line of succession that he turns on her. She then becomes a spectre who will haunt the family line when there will be a death in their lineage.

In respecting a boundary, Raymond and the King of Albania were abdicating part of their power given to them by the patriarchal system they were entrusted to maintain. This clearly illustrates the threat the “other” can impose on the sanctity of the established family, teaching how it only brings heartache and ruin for future generations. Underlining how an “outsider” woman who is not is in complete submission to her husband, like the women of the society were conditioned to do, must have flaws and secrets that threaten societal norms.