Week 12: A Place of Untold History

There is bond between humanity and nature that is unfortunately unable to be told by either side. It either leads to biased opinions or beliefs from humans, or just information that is simply not able to be processed by humans. Despite this lack of information, there is a way that humanity can connect with all forms of life that have existed since the early formation of the planet, and that is the Ocean. In Derek Walcott’s poem The Sea is History, it tells about significant moments in time as well as scripture and how it is all tied with the environment through the sands, the tides, and the marine life. Now while history as we know it is respected and continues to be so, there is without a doubt history that was undocumented; a perspective from the people that did not have the privilege of writing down information nor accounts from their point of view leading to certain events being forgotten or lost in time.

Connections between the imagery of ships, artifacts, and events in the bible referenced by Walcott are made to showcase the undisclosed chronicles of the people that were traded and shipped overseas to places against their will,

“as the white cowries clustered like manacles
on the drowned women,

and those were the ivory bracelets
of the Song of Solomon,
but the ocean kept turning blank pages” (Line 20-24).

While history can be altered and is subject to change over time with more and more information being revealed by historians, there is no denying that there is truly no way of certifying past events truthfully, but this very statement then leads to the question of what is considered factual history and what is not? If one were to answer this from a colonialist point-of-view, there would be no denying that documented historical accounts are sacrosanct leaving very little room for other perspectives (i.e. opposing views). If this is the universal rule in regards to history, then where does that leave the history that was never written down, the history that was erased, and the information that was not believed to be true? The medium between what is believed to be true and what is believed to be fabrication is the environment and as mentioned by Walcott, “The sea. The sea has locked them up. The sea is History” (Line 3-4). To the countless number of people that have been forgotten in time, to the honorable and the broken, there is no other representation of their troubles and background, other than the environment and whether or not some may not consider it, the history is there in the waters, and it can’t be erased.

The Ocean Archives: Environmental History

Derek Walcott’s poem shows that the Caribbean environment—especially the sea—is not just a backdrop to human events but a living archive of colonial violence and survival, which is exactly what environmental humanities asks us to see.

Walcott opens by relocating history from libraries and monuments to the ocean’s “grey vault.” In the poem, ships, bones, coral, and storms become chapter headings in a watery chronicle of conquest and enslavement. The sea “kept turning blank pages / looking for History,” reminding us that environmental destruction often erases human records even as it preserves other traces—like “bone soldered by coral to bone.” Environmental humanities studies these traces, reading landscapes and seascapes as texts that hold memory, ethics, and power. Oil slicks, hurricanes, and reefs aren’t scenery; they are evidence.

The poem also challenges who gets to be a historical actor. In the later stanzas, nonhuman creatures—the heron, bullfrog, mantis, bats, even “the dark ears of ferns”—form a kind of parliament. This is a multispecies politics, where the environment doesn’t merely witness events; it participates in them. By staging this chorus, Walcott pushes us to consider environmental justice that includes more-than-human voices and vulnerabilities. Walcott is clear that official milestones like Emancipation can fade “as the sea’s lace dries in the sun” if we ignore the ecological ground of memory. To care for oceans and coasts, then, is also to care for culture and history. Environmental humanities urges us to recover these submerged stories and to protect the places that hold them.

Week 12: The Sea is History

In Derek Walcott’s poem, “The Sea Is History”, one statement that stood out to me was: “The sea is History.” This short statement explains the deepness of the challenge to conventional perspectives of history and encourages readers to continuously rethink what composes history. This statement puts forth Walcott’s larger argument that real Caribbean history does not exist in official monuments or texts, but lies beneath the ocean, as the depths of the ocean represent buried memories that resist colonial suppression and seek reclamation.

At its most basic meaning, “The sea is history,” suggests the sea to be a vibrant archive, a store of pasts, saturated with the memories, stories, and traumas of people in the Caribbean. This statement invites consideration of the writings of history in any sense of monumentalism, written records, and even grand narratives that the poem suggests are either absent or erased from the Caribbean experience. Walcott’s positioning makes the sea more than a natural landscape and draws our attention to the sea as an agent of archiving memory through history. The sea is home to the bones of enslaved ancestors as Walcott notes, “soldered by coral,” that reference history that is physically and metaphorically submerged, under colonial amnesia.

The statement further signals that history is fluid and not just found in a book-it is changing and therefore, should be studied as we do water for its depth. The fluidity of the sea and its hanging tides and depths also resonates with the endless, fragile return to claim identity and histories in the Caribbean. The assertion also invokes thoughts that undermine simple/accepted stories of history through implying that history should be studied below the surface, and consequences of proximity to loss, silence and fragmentation (often the narratives that govern postcolonial memory) can be accepted if not embraced.

In addition, Walcott, through his juxtaposition of sea and history, attempts to link the Caribbean experience with other human experiences. The sea–the actual spatial/geographic site of the transatlantic slave trade–connects many histories of individual and collective exile, suffering, and triumph to experiences similar with, and within, a global context. The sea is a site of trauma; yet it is also a site of resurrection of restored, reclaimed stories that have been willfully erased and forgotten. The sea seemingly encapsulates both trauma and restoration. The sea has both a traumatic and redemptive significance, bestowed with theological and cultural significance, and most especially with respect to the connections made to the belief that, like the sea, history is both grave and womb of life.

In short, “The sea is history,” is a succinct statement that asserts a claim for history to be re-conceived as a contested living organism that exists within a collective remembrance beyond an existence that is simply written. It asserts and acknowledges some of the histories that have fallen out of the collective Caribbean consciousness and have contributed to Caribbean identity, and it also provides a strong engagement and relationship to Caribbean historiography that honors the past and provides a space for Caribbean people to engage with history now.

Seeing, Hearing

Dion Jones

Prof J. Pressman

ECL 305; Literature and the Environment

3 November 2025

Seeing, Hearing 

This weekend’s texts “The Water Will Carry Us Home” (TWWCUH) and  “Sirenomelia” utilize audio and visual storytelling in order to engage with a blue world. 

TWWCUH utilizes Afrofuturistic elements, as well as traditional African spiritual beliefs in its framing of water. Both aspects reach across space-time to connect them to the Igbo—and others—who chose to drown and those who were forced offboard who would otherwise be further trafficked in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. It depicts the forces—wind and water—that allowed the escape to take place as divine figures—as figures with agency. The formatting of the film includes both stop motion media—presumably physically crafted art—and live action depictions of the unnamed character. In effect, TWCCUH acknowledges the history of water as a path, water as imagination, and water as the future/a connective constant. 

“Sirenomelia” depicts liquid and solid water and the biological, crafted, and formed structures along them. The diegetic sound establishes and conflicts with a sense of isolation and absence. The only visible non-plant life to appear is that of a mermaid who traverses the seemingly abandoned artificial features and structures—which imply the search or use of some resource or foe. The mermaid is a figure that points at that which is not there or is no longer there and compares it to whatever is leftover. The mark of the U.S.-USSR Cold War persists despite the collapse of one of the adversaries. Further, it argues for the continued existence of water despite what comes, goes, or corrupts.

Week 11: Sironemelia (2017)

After watching the short film I found that this was showcasing the reality that mermaids would live in present day. The mix of nature, such as the abundant amount of snow and glaciers, with the mix of man made objects such as the telephone or signal pole, the bridge, and the concrete canal, for example, show the “hard” reality of nature. Within the first minute we see the vast land covered with snow, to then get immediately met with metal structures, which I assume is some sort of satellite, which is then followed by the word “Sironemelia” being displayed on the screen with a soft, but distinct screech. This was almost like a screech that possibly a mermaid, or other creature that lives within this sort of environment could make. It was as though we were hearing the screams of those affected by the man made objects, which aren’t supposed to be there.

As the video continues, I noticed what I presume is a mermaid, swimming in dark water (2:48) within what looked like a tunnel/road. This reminded me of the wild animals who often become road kill trying to cross a road that was built within their natural habitat. Not only was it swimming within an odd place, but it didn’t swim with much grace, and swam in a way like it was stuck in place, or caught in something. Again, something like a wild sea animal caught within a sea net. That specific frame could capsulate several of the different stories of the mermaids that are attempting to live within the confines of man and their spaces. Trapped, unable to move freely with the grace a mermaid has.

Mermaids a Symbol of Rebirth

“The Water Will Carry Us Home” a short film animated by Gabrielle Tesfaye captures and retells the story of African people who were captured and thrown off ship during the trip through the Middle Passage. I’ve had brief knowledge before, where I was told that captured Africans would be thrown off ship or willingly jump off ship because in their hearts they believe that the ocean waters would take them home to Africa as they transform into mermaids. Tesfaye was able to tell history from an overlooked perspective, one that is rooted deep in culture and spirituality.

In the opening scene of the animated film, a masculine figure holds a key in one hand. Both of his hands carrying an eye. He is surrounded by many doors, and the one he chooses emerges him amidst stormy sea waters. The third eyes seen in the story can be seen as a perspective shift, or the one that sees beyond a colonial narrative of the past. The film includes an old excerpt of a news article stating how African people were to be sold, describing them as healthy, the dehumanization and commodification of their lives blatant. The third eyes sees beyond this, it is a symbol of reclaiming their stolen lives with the help of their connection with the ocean. The ocean wasn’t something to be feared, not when it were other humans who have stolen their lives. Nature heals more than it destroys, a mystical mermaid goddess figure appears to embrace and redirect those who’ve been thrown off ship. Their transformations into mermaids and gaining a third eye is one of a spiritual rebirth.

The Mermaid and the Base

In Emelijia Škarnulytė’s short film “Sirenomelia,” around minute four and a half, there is an incredibly evocative moment when a mermaid is sen very quietly moving through the long, deserted passage within an unused NATO submarine base. The juxtaposition of the fluid and organic form of the mermaid with cold, mechanical environment generates such a compelling image of form, vulnerability, and strength all at once. This challenging moment converts a space that was designed to uphold military strength into a space of positive beauty that one does not expect. This important moment encapsulates the film’s central message; that new forms of life (even if mythical) or historically based realities can reclaim and reimagine spaces that have been socially and culturally shaped by conflict and human history. Furthermore, “Sirenomelia” argues that spaces clearly marked by human violence and power need not remain stagnant, but can be reimagined by beings with adaptive capabilities as species of newfound meaning, intersectionality, resilience, and hope.

The film engages audiences in exploring how spaces devoid of human action might not remain empty but could contain possibilities for other forms of life–with ecological adaptation and mythological re-enchantment in mind. Škarnulytė makes use of the mermaid–a reference to both the rare congenital condition of sirenomelia and also myth–as a symbol of transformation and survival that extends beyond notions of the human. By situating this character, the mermaid, in an abandons Cold War military base, the film proposes a challenge to the prior human power of the past, raising the possibility of surpassing internecine conflict and the potential for coexistence and meaning beyond the human.

For different moments in the film, the absence of human actors compels the audience to reflect on anthropocentric narratives, stating alternate futures in which the human and nonhuman worlds cohere. The wordless mermaid drifting through this antagonistic, masculine landscape signifies the influence of flexible, creative beings (in this case–a mermaid) to mend the wrecked worlds–turning violent spaces in trauma zones to places of stillness and hopeful transformation. The films cinematic techniques with lighting and sound are appropriated and employed within there stagings to amplify the transformation. For example, the harsh shadows and resonating silence emphasize the desolation in the spaces; the gentle gestures of the mermaid’s movement operate as a contrast and bring some humanity back to the old spatial base it passes through.

Additionally, the movie also employs symbols and setting to express how human legacy has the capacity to be both devastating and a source of potential for new life. The retired submarine base, a symbol of Cold War militarism, stands in as a monument to the remains of human warfare and a biocultural imperialism of technology. The mermaid’s representation, however, offers a promise of regeneration and transformation–a future where myth and the natural milieu can exist alongside remnants of human history. This scene at 4:30 especially serves as a metaphor for the larger theme of “Sirenomelia”: that remnants of human conflict can be reimagined anew, through more complex stories, and imaging of life beyond binaries of power and dominance, with a vision of the future based on adaptation and interrelation.

Week 10: Ocean Reader

After spending a fair amount of time going through the vocabulary we use daily that is frequently centered around dry land (which I recall focusing on in the first weeks), it is only after reading the introduction of The Ocean Reader: History, Culture, Politics by Eric Paul Roorda that I truly noticed the “anthropocentric” mentality humanity tends to have and just how senseless it sounds when the ocean “currently covers 71 percent of the world, a figure that is certain to rise along with sea level” (1). This advantage in regards to sheer size that the Ocean has over land and with that size gap increasing should be telling of the fact that humanity tends to ignore and neglect issues whether economic or environmental only until the damage has reached catastrophic levels which at that point, the problem is either irreversible or tremendously challenging to overcome.

Now, this dilemma involving living in harmony with nature is incredibly complex because at is mentioned in the reading, “Humans interact with that system in many ways. They relentlessly hunt sea creatures, taking 90 million tons of fish from it annually” (3). The interactions that occur between humans and animals are bound to have more disparities than similarities due to the evident power dynamic, but this is not to say that there is no hope or that humans are the only ones that can destroy or “save” the environment when it is also mentioned by Roorda that factors such as the ring of fire and the shifting of tectonic plates can significantly affect and alter Terra as we know it, and that is something we as humans can’t possibly control.

week 9

as I began reading the first page of the assignment I had developed a few ideas from the book such as the conflict humanity has with the environment as well as modernism and post modernism in which the author coins the term terracitrism and the old concept of seven seas.The author describes the seven seas as “one big ocean and while its regions have been conceptualized as seperate bodies of water and named as different oceans,the fact is,they are all connected “. It invites the reader to realize that all bodies of water that we depend on are all interconnected and makes one realize that we dont have seperate life lines.The author warns of impending dangers such as the 2011 japanese disaster in which epochal tsunamis being created by the underwater earthquakes.The big point the author claimed was that if we leave our enviornment unnoticed and leave ourselves clueless to these natural disasters caused by us then they will cause deadly consequences to many.While this may seem like dire consqueneces the author also highlight the importance of oceans as they provide for many marine mammals.

The Ocean is the Center… or should be.

In the introduction to The Ocean Reader, the editors encourage us to shift our perspective from land-first to an aqua centric one. The central claim is that the Ocean is a single, dynamic place whose neglect—rooted in terra-centrism—demands reorientation and urgent action. Against the illusion of changelessness, they foreground trenches, currents, and tectonic volatility to reveal a restless planetary system that structures human history as profoundly as any continent. By capitalizing “Ocean,” the book confers political and historical stature, dismantling cartographic partitions and the fiction of inexhaustible abundance; as the text declares, “there is only one interconnected global Ocean,” a circulatory body binding the Pacific to the Atlantic, the Arctic to the Southern.

Organized across themes—from origins and seafaring to science, recreation, warfare, and dire present—the anthology models a new Ocean history where ecology, culture, and power interpenetrate. It gathers overlooked gems and diverse voices to show how people have used, studied, traversed, and fought over the sea, even as they removed ninety million tons of life and steered a hundred thousand ships. The culminating warning is: after ignoring the Ocean, we face crises of heat, acidification, depletion, and plasticized food webs. Understanding our world requires centering the Ocean—and acting before rising water writes history for us.