In chapter 19, “Betrayal,” of André Lebey’s version of The Romance of the Faery Melusine there are continuous metaphors and euphemisms of sexual innuendos, more specifically sexual assault. Throughout the chapter the audience gets a third person limited perspective into Raymondin’s thoughts as he enters into Melusine’s private space. Significantly, Raymondin views his relationship with Melusine as the two of them being “the same and ever one flesh, […] At one with the earth, […] its meadows and woods, its sweet and fruitful soil.” (121). Here, their relationship is merging together as “one flesh” and also to nature being “one with the earth.” Their relationship is a physical joining to each other and to the environment that surrounds them. Though this merging may superficially seem beautiful with words such as “sweet” and “fruitful,” the diction is actually a euphemism for something more sinister. The word “sweet” for example is a pretense for the seductive nature of the scene, and “fruitful soil” equates to fertility. The metaphors and euphemisms strewn throughout the chapter can be seen through a feminist ecocritic lens where female bodies and land are seen as commodities to be explored and exploited.
This notion is apparent through Raymondin’s persistence in trying to get through the door to Melusines (metaphorical and literal) private place. As Raymondin has now discovered where Melusine goes on Saturdays, he is inexorable in leaving well alone. His intrusion is described as follows: “The blade entered [the door] a little, so slowly that he almost began to despair. But he forbade himself to think what he would do next, for he could not, he saw, fully part the adjacent boards. But he might make a crack wide enough to see through! He would soon find out something, no matter how!” (122). The imagery is more explicit in its violent forced entry with the blade opening the entry. The violence does not lie in his brute force but in the way that he chooses to try and enter. Raymondin could very well just knock on the door but instead takes a knife out and jimmies it in and “forbades” himself to think of the wrong he is doing. On that, the blade is a euphemism for penetration, it no longer is an instrument of survival but a tool of destruction. Which would mean that the door and “crack” are symbols of barriers to consent and bodily autonomy as Raymondin does not care for what is right as long as he finds what he seeks “no matter how.” Feminist ecocriticism presents the interconnection of conquering both feminine and environmental nature. This chapter evidently examines this concept through how Raymondin both sees and treats Melusine, something less than human. In this case, both land and women’s bodies are disrespected, pierced, and exposed for knowledge and profit.
Hi Sierra,
I really liked how you pointed out the way Raymondin’s intrusion can be seen as violent, especially with the thoughts of the blade and the crack in the door. I did think of it as an invasion of privacy but this makes it even more clear. I also really liked how you tied in how woman’s bodies and land are often treated as things to be used.
Hi Sierra! I think you did a great job explaining how Chapter 19 shows the connection between Melusine’s body and the nature of the land. I really like how you pointed out that words like “sweet” and “fruitful” sound nice at first, but really cover up something violent. The part about Raymondin using the dagger instead of just knocking was a really strong point, because it shows how he ignores Melusine’s choice to let him in or not. I also agree that the blade can be seen as a symbol of forced penetration and violation of her body. Overall, your response makes it clear how Raymondin’s actions show power and control instead of love. Nice post! 🙂
I agree with your peers: this is a smart blog post full of really good ideas and some good close reading. I see that at the end of your post you’re starting to push to larger so what claims about WHY the text presents this a sexual violence and an invasion of space and property. I’d love to see you connect the close reading/ explication with that “so what” claim into a strong thesis statement. Then you could use it for a midterm essay.
Hi Sierra!
I really love that you capture how the betrayal of Raymondin’s vow essentially violates Melusine’s privacy, showcasing (as you bring up in the post) the dismissal of women’s autonomy and privacy. Your use of the word “penetration” is also very insightful since indicates that he is entering this sacred space and violating it for his personal gratification. You correctly point out that he doesn’t care what it does to their marriage as long has he can access this personal part of Melusine. Great post!